[at-l] WB

[Jim Bullard]

That has been suggested to R&R several times before over several years
but he has yet to do it. Apparently we (the members of AT-L) aren't
the only ones who aren't really serious about the trail the way we
should be.

On 3/2/07, rcli4 at comcast.net <rcli4 at comcast.net> wrote:
> I have an idea R-n-R.  Start your own list.  I think you can do it for free on yahoo.  Set up rules and list away.  Then you could start serious discussions with yourself.
>
> Clyde
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: RoksnRoots at aol.com
> > In a message dated 3/2/2007 12:18:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > sloetoe at yahoo.com writes:
> > *
> > Whiteblaze is serious; at-l is friendly; depends on
> > what you want. You can make friends on serious
> > Whiteblaze, and you can get info on sociable at-l, and
> > in either place, it helps to walk your talk.
> > *
> >
> >                  They're all good, but I have yet to see a site that grabs
> > the Trail the way it should be. WF tried but we all know where that went. ATC is
> > too thin and stretched out as a volunteer group trying to do too much with
> > too little. I'd like to see something that establishes the central mission as an
> > understood theme and organizes it towards the Trail. Drawing in volunteers
> > and expanding the Trail's purpose in real gains. The internet is perfect for
> > that but has yet to rise above a social forum designed to chat about the Trail
> > and post trip reports. I guess you need a pro-active community for that.
> >

-- 
Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/