[at-l] i'm gonna spew

[Kent Gardam]

Felix, my friend, 
   
  You probably did better on the verbal portion of your SAT's than the math, didn't you?  Sadly, I think some of your math concepts are erusticating away.  Fr'instance, when multiplying an object by itself, all you get is the original object (1x1=1), assuming of course that the object is singular (which is what we all are covinced you is/are?).  But, if'n you were bipolar, then Felix x Felix would equal 4 Felices, not two.  This is the multiplicative property, not the additive property.  The additive property, as one who is from Indiana should surely know, is STP.  Also when you divide by zero, you don't get zero, but instead an undefined sort of infinite concept, which again seems to fit in the case of  4 Felices.  The 4 Felices, hmmm, now that I thinking of it, wasn't that a vaudeville group, or maybe it was mountains in Tibet?
   
  Kent

Felix J <athiker at smithville.net> wrote:
  Yeah, but I think that 1x1/0 rule would come into play. (Felix) x 
(Felix)= 2Felix 2Felix/0= 0 So, 35=0 Which, ironically, is the same 
amount that has been bid on my "Felix/Earl/Wingfoot/Pokey Autograffed 
Thru-hiker's Handbook"


-- 
Felix J. McGillicuddy
ME-->GA '98
"Your Move"
ALT '03 KT '03
http://Felixhikes.tripod.com/

_______________________________________________
AT-L Mailing List. 

Go here to unsubscribe or change your options:

http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l