[at-l] Base Weights - Survey?
Raphael Bustin
rafeb at speakeasy.net
Fri Sep 22 22:14:34 CDT 2006
At 10:37 PM 9/22/2006 -0400, Greenbriar wrote:
>Terrapin writes:
>>Pack 68 oz 4# 4
>>(short) thermarest in stuff sack 18.6 1# 3
>>tent Sierra Lightyear in stuff sack 53.5 3# 6
>>"slumberjack" down bag in stuff sack 34.5 2# 3
>>pack cover 8.6 9
>>-> Total of these 4 items: 183.2 oz (11.4 lbs)
>>
>The big 3: pack, bag, tent!
>I used external frame packs for 25 years - I loved the compartments and
>the support. Got sick of the way they started to get made more and more
>cheaply and fell apart after a month of hiking. I use a home made G-4 now
>and love it. It weighs 1#1oz.
I have considered something home-brew. I'm afraid
it will need an external frame. One solution might be
a replacement "bag" (maybe made of sil-nylon) over the
existing Camp Trails frame.
>If you have to have a thermarest to get a good night's sleep, you are
>stuck. But at least try a light pad. No, it isn't as comfortable as a
>thermarest - to sleep on. But it is a lot more comfortable carrying ;) And
>it's pretty comfortable. And nice and warm.
I started hiking 30 yrs ago with Ensolite (closed-cell foam)
and Thermarest really changed my outlook. I "compromise"
by using the shortie. I still have the old Ensolite pad. Youch.
>If you really want to cut down weight you need to try a different tent. I
>have gone over to single wall tents, and learned to deal with the
>condensation.Water- resistant/proof shell material on the bag helps
>tremendously.
I'm spoiled, what can I say. My Eureka Gossamer was
a bit lighter (under 3 lbs) but was more cramped.
>Is the 1/2 pound pack cover really worth it?
Not necessarily, as you point out.
>Ever tried a trash bag instead - they really work. Myself, I gave up on
>pack covers. I safeguard my bag and clothes in mylar turkey roasting bags
>and let the rest get as wet as they want - the G-4 keeps things pretty
>dry, and who cares if the platypi, say, get wet? Or my baseball hat - it
>gets wet enough in the rain pretty soon anyway.
>
>BTW, stuff sacks are heavy. Try to find some made from silnylon if you can.
>>MSR water filter 19 1# 3
>>Stove+fuel bottle+screen+spoon+pot++mug 27.2 1#11
>>Nalgene Qt. bottles (3 @4.1ea) 12
>>Camera 11 11
>>--> Total of this group = 69.5 oz (4.3 lbs.)
>>
>That is one heavy water filter. As Hoplite mentioned, Aqua Mira or even
>Clorox gets the job done. Two 2 1/5 liter platypus (NOT the wide mouth
>type, the light weight type) plus a 1 liter soda bottle gives you 6 liters
>of water for 5 ounces - that beats 12 ounces for the two 1 quart Nalgenes.
That was 12 oz for *three* 1-qt. Nalgenes.
I guess MSR has lighter filters now. Mine is the
"equivalent" of the Waterworks EX, I guess. It's
been a real trooper.
I'm not up on the latest "camel backs" and
platypi and hydration-systems. Must look into it.
The MSR filter outlet "mates" with the Nalgene
bottle threads. Very handy.
>>CLOTHING (in pack)
>>2 pr undies 6 oz.
>>long polypro undies top+bottom 15
>>3 pr hiking sox 10
>>long sleeve flannel (acrylic) shirt 16
>>fleece gloves & hat 5.3
>>wash towel 3.6
>>nylon rain jacket 6
>>Gators 5.3
>>Seattle Sombrero 4
>>--> Total of this group: 71.2 oz (4.5 lbs)
>>
>This is about 1 1/2 lbs more than I carry, and I feel I am acting
>responsibly. Do you need fleece gloves and hat for summer?
I appreciated the hat at camp and while sleeping
on the NY-PA section I just did. The gloves, no.
The acrylic shirt went mostly unused (except as a
pillow.) Polypro was enough. With rain jacket in a pinch.
>Are the gators worth the weight penalty? 3 pairs of socks plus one worn? I
>feel sinful carrying 2 plus wearing 1.
I always wonder about gators. OK, they're gone.
(That was easy!)
*Very* nice to count on a pair of dry clean sox at camp.
That seems worth 3.5 oz.
>>Between these three groups, there are 20.2 lbs.
>>accounted for. The rest is small & sundry items --
>>bear rope, headlamp, repair kits, first aid and
>>emergency stuff etc.
>>
>>The pack is an *ancient* Camp Trails Adjustable II,
>>which I have tried several times to "upgrade" from --
>>with no success. Almost 100% of my AT hiking (1589
>>miles to date) has been with this pack -- and most
>>of the rest of the kit, pretty much as listed above.
>>
>
>I am very happy with my G-4. It is light, roomy and accessible. You might
>get to like a lighter pack - try one.
>
>Hope this helps.
I'll look into it. Thanks for your suggestions.
Can I conclude that y'all have gone ultralight?
Is my 22 lbs considered outrageously heavy?
I'm the only "heavyweight?" Yikes.
rafe b
aka terrapin
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006
More information about the at-l
mailing list